The Imprecisions of Precision Measures in Process Mining

May 03, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Information Processing Letters

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Niek Tax, Xixi Lu, Natalia Sidorova, Dirk Fahland, Wil M. P. van der Aalst arXiv ID 1705.03303 Category cs.DB: Databases Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.LO, cs.SE Citations 60 Venue Information Processing Letters Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
In process mining, precision measures are used to quantify how much a process model overapproximates the behavior seen in an event log. Although several measures have been proposed throughout the years, no research has been done to validate whether these measures achieve the intended aim of quantifying over-approximation in a consistent way for all models and logs. This paper fills this gap by postulating a number of axioms for quantifying precision consistently for any log and any model. Further, we show through counter-examples that none of the existing measures consistently quantifies precision.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Databases

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted