Lossy Kernels for Connected Dominating Set on Sparse Graphs

June 28, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Eduard Eiben, Mithilesh Kumar, Amer E. Mouawad, Fahad Panolan, Sebastian Siebertz arXiv ID 1706.09339 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.DM Citations 33 Venue Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
For $Ξ±> 1$, an $Ξ±$-approximate (bi-)kernel is a polynomial-time algorithm that takes as input an instance $(I, k)$ of a problem $\mathcal{Q}$ and outputs an instance $(I',k')$ (of a problem $\mathcal{Q}'$) of size bounded by a function of $k$ such that, for every $c\geq 1$, a $c$-approximate solution for the new instance can be turned into a $(c\cdotΞ±)$-approximate solution of the original instance in polynomial time. This framework of lossy kernelization was recently introduced by Lokshtanov et al. We study Connected Dominating Set (and its distance-$r$ variant) parameterized by solution size on sparse graph classes like biclique-free graphs, classes of bounded expansion, and nowhere dense classes. We prove that for every $Ξ±>1$, Connected Dominating Set admits a polynomial-size $Ξ±$-approximate (bi-)kernel on all the aforementioned classes. Our results are in sharp contrast to the kernelization complexity of Connected Dominating Set, which is known to not admit a polynomial kernel even on $2$-degenerate graphs and graphs of bounded expansion, unless $\textsf{NP} \subseteq \textsf{coNP/poly}$. We complement our results by the following conditional lower bound. We show that if a class $\mathcal{C}$ is somewhere dense and closed under taking subgraphs, then for some value of $r\in\mathbb{N}$ there cannot exist an $Ξ±$-approximate bi-kernel for the (Connected) Distance-$r$ Dominating Set problem on $\mathcal{C}$ for any $Ξ±>1$ (assuming the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted