Relaxing Integrity Requirements for Attack-Resilient Cyber-Physical Systems

July 10, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ilija Jovanov, Miroslav Pajic arXiv ID 1707.02950 Category math.OC: Optimization & Control Cross-listed cs.CR, eess.SY Citations 62 Venue IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The increase in network connectivity has also resulted in several high-profile attacks on cyber-physical systems. An attacker that manages to access a local network could remotely affect control performance by tampering with sensor measurements delivered to the controller. Recent results have shown that with network-based attacks, such as Man-in-the-Middle attacks, the attacker can introduce an unbounded state estimation error if measurements from a suitable subset of sensors contain false data when delivered to the controller. While these attacks can be addressed with the standard cryptographic tools that ensure data integrity, their continuous use would introduce significant communication and computation overhead. Consequently, we study effects of intermittent data integrity guarantees on system performance under stealthy attacks. We consider linear estimators equipped with a general type of residual-based intrusion detectors (including $Ο‡^2$ and SPRT detectors), and show that even when integrity of sensor measurements is enforced only intermittently, the attack impact is significantly limited; specifically, the state estimation error is bounded or the attacker cannot remain stealthy. Furthermore, we present methods to: (1) evaluate the effects of any given integrity enforcement policy in terms of reachable state-estimation errors for any type of stealthy attacks, and (2) design an enforcement policy that provides the desired estimation error guarantees under attack. Finally, on three automotive case studies we show that even with less than 10% of authenticated messages we can ensure satisfiable control performance in the presence of attacks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Optimization & Control

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted