Asymptotically Optimal Load Balancing Topologies
July 18, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Debankur Mukherjee, Sem C. Borst, Johan S. H. van Leeuwaarden
arXiv ID
1707.05866
Category
math.PR
Cross-listed
cs.DM,
cs.NI,
cs.PF
Citations
39
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
We consider a system of $N$ servers inter-connected by some underlying graph topology $G_N$. Tasks arrive at the various servers as independent Poisson processes of rate $Ξ»$. Each incoming task is irrevocably assigned to whichever server has the smallest number of tasks among the one where it appears and its neighbors in $G_N$. Tasks have unit-mean exponential service times and leave the system upon service completion. The above model has been extensively investigated in the case $G_N$ is a clique. Since the servers are exchangeable in that case, the queue length process is quite tractable, and it has been proved that for any $Ξ»< 1$, the fraction of servers with two or more tasks vanishes in the limit as $N \to \infty$. For an arbitrary graph $G_N$, the lack of exchangeability severely complicates the analysis, and the queue length process tends to be worse than for a clique. Accordingly, a graph $G_N$ is said to be $N$-optimal or $\sqrt{N}$-optimal when the occupancy process on $G_N$ is equivalent to that on a clique on an $N$-scale or $\sqrt{N}$-scale, respectively. We prove that if $G_N$ is an ErdΕs-RΓ©nyi random graph with average degree $d(N)$, then it is with high probability $N$-optimal and $\sqrt{N}$-optimal if $d(N) \to \infty$ and $d(N) / (\sqrt{N} \log(N)) \to \infty$ as $N \to \infty$, respectively. This demonstrates that optimality can be maintained at $N$-scale and $\sqrt{N}$-scale while reducing the number of connections by nearly a factor $N$ and $\sqrt{N} / \log(N)$ compared to a clique, provided the topology is suitably random. It is further shown that if $G_N$ contains $Ξ(N)$ bounded-degree nodes, then it cannot be $N$-optimal. In addition, we establish that an arbitrary graph $G_N$ is $N$-optimal when its minimum degree is $N - o(N)$, and may not be $N$-optimal even when its minimum degree is $c N + o(N)$ for any $0 < c < 1/2$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β math.PR
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Non-backtracking spectrum of random graphs: community detection and non-regular Ramanujan graphs
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Convergence of the Deep BSDE Method for Coupled FBSDEs
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Random Matrix Approach to Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Concentration and regularization of random graphs
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted