MFDL: A Multicarrier Fresnel Penetration Model based Device-Free Localization System leveraging Commodity Wi-Fi Cards
July 21, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Hao Wang, Daqing Zhang, Kai Niu, Qin Lv, Yuanhuai Liu, Dan Wu, Ruiyang Gao, Bing Xie
arXiv ID
1707.07514
Category
cs.NI: Networking & Internet
Citations
32
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
Device-free localization plays an important role in many ubiquitous applications. Among the different technologies proposed, Wi-Fi based technology using commercial devices has attracted much attention due to its low cost, ease of deployment, and high potential for accurate localization. Existing solutions use either fingerprints that require labor-intensive radio-map survey and updates, or models constructed from empirical studies with dense deployment of Wi-Fi transceivers. In this work, we explore the Fresnel Zone Theory in physics and propose a generic Fresnel Penetration Model (FPM), which reveals the linear relationship between specific Fresnel zones and multicarrier Fresnel phase difference, along with the Fresnel phase offset caused by static multipath environments. We validate FPM in both outdoor and complex indoor environments. Furthermore, we design a multicarrier FPM based device-free localization system (MFDL), which overcomes a number of practical challenges, particularly the Fresnel phase difference estimation and phase offset calibration in multipath-rich indoor environments. Extensive experimental results show that compared with the state-of-the-art work (LiFS), our MFDL system achieves better localization accuracy with much fewer number of Wi-Fi transceivers. Specifically, using only three transceivers, the median localization error of MFDL is as low as 45$cm$ in an outdoor environment of 36$m^2$, and 55$cm$ in indoor settings of 25$m^2$. Increasing the number of transceivers to four allows us to achieve 75$cm$ median localization error in a 72$m^2$ indoor area, compared with the 1.1$m$ median localization error achieved by LiFS using 11 transceivers in a 70$m^2$ area.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Networking & Internet
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Survey of Important Issues in UAV Communication Networks
π
π
The Cartographer
Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges
π
π
The Cartographer
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted