MFDL: A Multicarrier Fresnel Penetration Model based Device-Free Localization System leveraging Commodity Wi-Fi Cards

July 21, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hao Wang, Daqing Zhang, Kai Niu, Qin Lv, Yuanhuai Liu, Dan Wu, Ruiyang Gao, Bing Xie arXiv ID 1707.07514 Category cs.NI: Networking & Internet Citations 32 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Device-free localization plays an important role in many ubiquitous applications. Among the different technologies proposed, Wi-Fi based technology using commercial devices has attracted much attention due to its low cost, ease of deployment, and high potential for accurate localization. Existing solutions use either fingerprints that require labor-intensive radio-map survey and updates, or models constructed from empirical studies with dense deployment of Wi-Fi transceivers. In this work, we explore the Fresnel Zone Theory in physics and propose a generic Fresnel Penetration Model (FPM), which reveals the linear relationship between specific Fresnel zones and multicarrier Fresnel phase difference, along with the Fresnel phase offset caused by static multipath environments. We validate FPM in both outdoor and complex indoor environments. Furthermore, we design a multicarrier FPM based device-free localization system (MFDL), which overcomes a number of practical challenges, particularly the Fresnel phase difference estimation and phase offset calibration in multipath-rich indoor environments. Extensive experimental results show that compared with the state-of-the-art work (LiFS), our MFDL system achieves better localization accuracy with much fewer number of Wi-Fi transceivers. Specifically, using only three transceivers, the median localization error of MFDL is as low as 45$cm$ in an outdoor environment of 36$m^2$, and 55$cm$ in indoor settings of 25$m^2$. Increasing the number of transceivers to four allows us to achieve 75$cm$ median localization error in a 72$m^2$ indoor area, compared with the 1.1$m$ median localization error achieved by LiFS using 11 transceivers in a 70$m^2$ area.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Networking & Internet

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted