Just Take the Average! An Embarrassingly Simple $2^n$-Time Algorithm for SVP (and CVP)

September 05, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Divesh Aggarwal, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz arXiv ID 1709.01535 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 35 Venue SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We show a $2^{n+o(n)}$-time (and space) algorithm for the Shortest Vector Problem on lattices (SVP) that works by repeatedly running an embarrassingly simple "pair and average" sieving-like procedure on a list of lattice vectors. This matches the running time (and space) of the current fastest known algorithm, due to Aggarwal, Dadush, Regev, and Stephens-Davidowitz (ADRS, in STOC, 2015), with a far simpler algorithm. Our algorithm is in fact a modification of the ADRS algorithm, with a certain careful rejection sampling step removed. The correctness of our algorithm follows from a more general "meta-theorem," showing that such rejection sampling steps are unnecessary for a certain class of algorithms and use cases. In particular, this also applies to the related $2^{n + o(n)}$-time algorithm for the Closest Vector Problem (CVP), due to Aggarwal, Dadush, and Stephens-Davidowitz (ADS, in FOCS, 2015), yielding a similar embarrassingly simple algorithm for $Ξ³$-approximate CVP for any $Ξ³= 1+2^{-o(n/\log n)}$. (We can also remove the rejection sampling procedure from the $2^{n+o(n)}$-time ADS algorithm for exact CVP, but the resulting algorithm is still quite complicated.)
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted