Non-Cash Auction for Spectrum Trading in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Contract Theoretical Model with Joint Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
September 25, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yanru Zhang, Lingyang Song, Miao Pan, Zaher Dawy, Zhu Han
arXiv ID
1709.08317
Category
cs.NI: Networking & Internet
Cross-listed
cs.GT
Citations
42
Venue
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
In cognitive radio networks (CRNs), spectrum trading is an efficient way for secondary users (SUs) to achieve dynamic spectrum access and to bring economic benefits for the primary users (PUs). Existing methods requires full payment from SU, which blocked many potential "buyers", and thus limited the PU's expected income. To better improve PUs' revenue from spectrum trading in a CRN, we introduce a financing contract, which is similar to a sealed non-cash auction that allows SU to do a financing. Unlike previous mechanism designs in CRN, the financing contract allows the SU to only pay part of the total amount when the contract is signed, known as the down payment. Then, after the spectrum is released and utilized, the SU pays the rest of payment, known as the installment payment, from the revenue generated by utilizing the spectrum. The way the financing contract carries out and the sealed non-cash auction works similarly. Thus, contract theory is employed here as the mathematical framework to solve the non-cash auction problem and form mutually beneficial relationships between PUs and SUs. As the PU may not have the full acknowledgement of the SU's financial status, nor the SU's capability in making revenue, the problems of adverse selection and moral hazard arise in the two scenarios, respectively. Therefore, a joint adverse selection and moral hazard model is considered here. In particular, we present three situations when either or both adverse selection and moral hazard are present during the trading. Furthermore, both discrete and continuous models are provided in this paper. Through extensive simulations, we show that the adverse selection and moral hazard cases serve as the upper and lower bounds of the general case where both problems are present.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Networking & Internet
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Survey of Important Issues in UAV Communication Networks
π
π
The Cartographer
Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges
π
π
The Cartographer
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted