Ranked Enumeration of Minimal Triangulations

September 29, 2017 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Noam Ravid, Dori Medini, Benny Kimelfeld arXiv ID 1709.10254 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 16 Venue ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
A tree decomposition of a graph facilitates computations by grouping vertices into bags that are interconnected in an acyclic structure, hence their importance in a plethora of problems such as query evaluation over databases and inference over probabilistic graphical models. The relative benefit from different tree decompositions is measured by diverse (sometime complex) cost functions that vary from one application to another. For generic cost functions like width and fill-in, an optimal tree decomposition can be efficiently computed in some cases, notably when the number of minimal separators is bounded by a polynomial (due to Bouchitte and Todinca), we refer to this assumption as "poly-MS." To cover the variety of cost functions in need, it has recently been proposed to devise algorithms for enumerating many decomposition candidates for applications to choose from using specialized, or even machine-learned, cost functions. We explore the ability to produce a large collection of "high quality" tree decompositions. We present the first algorithm for ranked enumeration of the proper (non-redundant) tree decompositions, or equivalently minimal triangulations, under a wide class of cost functions that substantially generalizes the above generic ones. On the theoretical side, we establish the guarantee of polynomial delay if poly-MS is assumed, or if we are interested in tree decompositions of a width bounded by a constant. We describe an experimental evaluation on graphs of various domains (including join queries, Bayesian networks, treewidth benchmarks and random), and explore both the applicability of the poly-MS assumption and the performance of our algorithm relative to the state of the art.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted