Improved Upper Bound on the Network Function Computing Capacity
October 06, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Xuan Guang, Raymond W. Yeung, Shenghao Yang, Congduan Li
arXiv ID
1710.02252
Category
cs.IT: Information Theory
Citations
38
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
The problem of network function computation over a directed acyclic network is investigated in this paper. In such a network, a sink node desires to compute with zero error a {\em target function}, of which the inputs are generated at multiple source nodes. The edges in the network are assumed to be error-free and have limited capacity. The nodes in the network are assumed to have unbounded computing capability and be able to perform network coding. The {\em computing rate} of a network code that can compute the target function over the network is the average number of times that the target function is computed with zero error for one use of the network. In this paper, we obtain an improved upper bound on the computing capacity, which is applicable to arbitrary target functions and arbitrary network topologies. This improved upper bound not only is an enhancement of the previous upper bounds but also is the first tight upper bound on the computing capacity for computing an arithmetic sum over a certain non-tree network, which has been widely studied in the literature. We also introduce a multi-dimensional array approach that facilitates evaluation of the improved upper bound. Furthermore, we apply this bound to the problem of computing a vector-linear function over a network. With this bound, we are able to not only enhance a previous result on computing a vector-linear function over a network but also simplify the proof significantly. Finally, we prove that for computing the binary maximum function over the reverse butterfly network, our improved upper bound is not achievable. This result establishes that in general our improved upper bound is non achievable, but whether it is asymptotically achievable or not remains open.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Information Theory
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Towards Smart and Reconfigurable Environment: Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Wireless Network
π
π
The Cartographer
Wireless Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Communication
π
π
The Cartographer
An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted