Time-Division is Optimal for Covert Communication over Some Broadcast Channels

October 26, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Vincent Y. F. Tan, Si-Hyeon Lee arXiv ID 1710.09754 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Cross-listed cs.CR Citations 64 Venue IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We consider a covert communication scenario where a transmitter wishes to communicate simultaneously to two legitimate receivers while ensuring that the communication is not detected by an adversary, the warden. The legitimate receivers and the adversary observe the transmission from the transmitter via a three-user discrete or Gaussian memoryless broadcast channel. We focus on the case where the "no-input" symbol is not redundant, i.e., the output distribution at the warden induced by the no-input symbol is not a mixture of the output distributions induced by other input symbols, so that the covert communication is governed by the square root law, i.e., at most $Θ(\sqrt{n})$ bits can be transmitted over $n$ channel uses. We show that for such a setting, a simple time-division strategy achieves the optimal throughputs for a non-trivial class of broadcast channels; this is not true for communicating over broadcast channels without the covert communication constraint. Our result implies that a code that uses two separate optimal point-to-point codes each designed for the constituent channels and each used for a fraction of the time is optimal in the sense that it achieves the best constants of the $\sqrt{n}$-scaling for the throughputs. Our proof strategy combines several elements in the network information theory literature, including concave envelope representations of the capacity regions of broadcast channels and El Gamal's outer bound for more capable broadcast channels.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted