Collaborative Spatial Reuse in Wireless Networks via Selfish Multi-Armed Bandits
October 31, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Ad hoc networks
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Francesc Wilhelmi, Cristina Cano, Gergely Neu, Boris Bellalta, Anders Jonsson, Sergio Barrachina-MuΓ±oz
arXiv ID
1710.11403
Category
cs.NI: Networking & Internet
Citations
56
Venue
Ad hoc networks
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Next-generation wireless deployments are characterized by being dense and uncoordinated, which often leads to inefficient use of resources and poor performance. To solve this, we envision the utilization of completely decentralized mechanisms to enable Spatial Reuse (SR). In particular, we focus on dynamic channel selection and Transmission Power Control (TPC). We rely on Reinforcement Learning (RL), and more specifically on Multi-Armed Bandits (MABs), to allow networks to learn their best configuration. In this work, we study the exploration-exploitation trade-off by means of the $\varepsilon$-greedy, EXP3, UCB and Thompson sampling action-selection, and compare their performance. In addition, we study the implications of selecting actions simultaneously in an adversarial setting (i.e., concurrently), and compare it with a sequential approach. Our results show that optimal proportional fairness can be achieved, even when no information about neighboring networks is available to the learners and Wireless Networks (WNs) operate selfishly. However, there is high temporal variability in the throughput experienced by the individual networks, specially for $\varepsilon$-greedy and EXP3. These strategies, contrary to UCB and Thompson sampling, base their operation on the absolute experienced reward, rather than on its distribution. We identify the cause of this variability to be the adversarial setting of our setup in which the set of most played actions provide intermittent good/poor performance depending on the neighboring decisions. We also show that learning sequentially, even if using a selfish strategy, contributes to minimize this variability. The sequential approach is therefore shown to effectively deal with the challenges posed by the adversarial settings that are typically found in decentralized WNs.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Networking & Internet
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Survey of Important Issues in UAV Communication Networks
π
π
The Cartographer
Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges
π
π
The Cartographer
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted