Cost-Efficient and Robust On-Demand Video Transcoding Using Heterogeneous Cloud Services

November 03, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xiangbo Li, Mohsen Amini Salehi, Magdy Bayoumi, Nian-Feng Tzeng, Rajkumar Buyya arXiv ID 1711.01008 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Citations 62 Venue IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Video streams usually have to be transcoded to match the characteristics of viewers' devices. Streaming providers have to store numerous transcoded versions of a given video to serve various display devices. Given the fact that viewers' access pattern to video streams follows a long tail distribution, for the video streams with low access rate, we propose to transcode them in an on-demand manner using cloud computing services. The challenge in utilizing cloud services for on-demand video transcoding is to maintain a robust QoS for viewers and cost-efficiency for streaming service providers. To address this challenge, we present the Cloud-based Video Streaming Services (CVS2) architecture. It includes a QoS-aware scheduling that maps transcoding tasks to the VMs by considering the affinity of the transcoding tasks with the allocated heterogeneous VMs. To maintain robustness in the presence of varying streaming requests, the architecture includes a cost-efficient VM Provisioner. This component provides a self- configurable cluster of heterogeneous VMs. The cluster is reconfigured dynamically to maintain the maximum affinity with the arriving workload. Results obtained under diverse workload conditions demonstrate that CVS2 architecture can maintain a robust QoS for viewers while reducing the incurred cost of the streaming service provider up to 85%
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Distributed Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted