The TensorFlow Partitioning and Scheduling Problem: It's the Critical Path!

November 06, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ruben Mayer, Christian Mayer, Larissa Laich arXiv ID 1711.01912 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Citations 49 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
State-of-the-art data flow systems such as TensorFlow impose iterative calculations on large graphs that need to be partitioned on heterogeneous devices such as CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs. However, partitioning can not be viewed in isolation. Each device has to select the next graph vertex to be executed, i.e., perform local scheduling decisions. Both problems, partitioning and scheduling, are NP-complete by themselves but have to be solved in combination in order to minimize overall execution time of an iteration. In this paper, we propose several heuristic strategies to solve the partitioning and scheduling problem in TensorFlow. We simulate the performance of the proposed strategies in heterogeneous environments with communication-intensive workloads that are common to TensorFlow. Our findings indicate that the best partitioning and scheduling heuristics are those that focus on minimizing the execution time of the critical path in the graph. Those strategies provide a speed-up of up to 4 times in comparison to strategies that are agnostic to the critical path, such as hash-based partitioning and FIFO scheduling.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Distributed Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted