Comparing Bug Finding Tools with Reviews and Tests

November 14, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Testing (of Software and) Communication Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Stefan Wagner, Jan JΓΌrjens, Claudia Koller, Peter Trischberger arXiv ID 1711.05019 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.PL Citations 139 Venue International Conference on Testing (of Software and) Communication Systems Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Bug finding tools can find defects in software source code us- ing an automated static analysis. This automation may be able to reduce the time spent for other testing and review activities. For this we need to have a clear understanding of how the defects found by bug finding tools relate to the defects found by other techniques. This paper describes a case study using several projects mainly from an industrial environment that were used to analyse the interrelationships. The main finding is that the bug finding tools predominantly find different defects than testing but a subset of defects found by reviews. However, the types that can be detected are analysed more thoroughly. Therefore, a combination is most advisable if the high number of false positives of the tools can be tolerated.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted