Optimizing Kernel Machines using Deep Learning
November 15, 2017 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Huan Song, Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan, Prasanna Sattigeri, Andreas Spanias
arXiv ID
1711.05374
Category
stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat)
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
54
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Building highly non-linear and non-parametric models is central to several state-of-the-art machine learning systems. Kernel methods form an important class of techniques that induce a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) for inferring non-linear models through the construction of similarity functions from data. These methods are particularly preferred in cases where the training data sizes are limited and when prior knowledge of the data similarities is available. Despite their usefulness, they are limited by the computational complexity and their inability to support end-to-end learning with a task-specific objective. On the other hand, deep neural networks have become the de facto solution for end-to-end inference in several learning paradigms. In this article, we explore the idea of using deep architectures to perform kernel machine optimization, for both computational efficiency and end-to-end inferencing. To this end, we develop the DKMO (Deep Kernel Machine Optimization) framework, that creates an ensemble of dense embeddings using Nystrom kernel approximations and utilizes deep learning to generate task-specific representations through the fusion of the embeddings. Intuitively, the filters of the network are trained to fuse information from an ensemble of linear subspaces in the RKHS. Furthermore, we introduce the kernel dropout regularization to enable improved training convergence. Finally, we extend this framework to the multiple kernel case, by coupling a global fusion layer with pre-trained deep kernel machines for each of the constituent kernels. Using case studies with limited training data, and lack of explicit feature sources, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework over conventional model inferencing techniques.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Machine Learning (Stat)
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Layer Normalization
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows
๐
๐
The Cartographer
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted