Multi-Objective Maximization of Monotone Submodular Functions with Cardinality Constraint

November 17, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Neural Information Processing Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Rajan Udwani arXiv ID 1711.06428 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed math.OC, stat.ML Citations 34 Venue Neural Information Processing Systems Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We consider the problem of multi-objective maximization of monotone submodular functions subject to cardinality constraint, often formulated as $\max_{|A|=k}\min_{i\in\{1,\dots,m\}}f_i(A)$. While it is widely known that greedy methods work well for a single objective, the problem becomes much harder with multiple objectives. In fact, Krause et al.\ (2008) showed that when the number of objectives $m$ grows as the cardinality $k$ i.e., $m=Ξ©(k)$, the problem is inapproximable (unless $P=NP$). On the other hand, when $m$ is constant Chekuri et al.\ (2010) showed a randomized $(1-1/e)-Ξ΅$ approximation with runtime (number of queries to function oracle) $n^{m/Ξ΅^3}$. %In fact, the result of Chekuri et al.\ (2010) is for the far more general case of matroid constant. We focus on finding a fast and practical algorithm that has (asymptotic) approximation guarantees even when $m$ is super constant. We first modify the algorithm of Chekuri et al.\ (2010) to achieve a $(1-1/e)$ approximation for $m=o(\frac{k}{\log^3 k})$. This demonstrates a steep transition from constant factor approximability to inapproximability around $m=Ξ©(k)$. Then using Multiplicative-Weight-Updates (MWU), we find a much faster $\tilde{O}(n/Ξ΄^3)$ time asymptotic $(1-1/e)^2-Ξ΄$ approximation. While the above results are all randomized, we also give a simple deterministic $(1-1/e)-Ξ΅$ approximation with runtime $kn^{m/Ξ΅^4}$. Finally, we run synthetic experiments using Kronecker graphs and find that our MWU inspired heuristic outperforms existing heuristics.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted