Fully Dynamic Almost-Maximal Matching: Breaking the Polynomial Barrier for Worst-Case Time Bounds
November 18, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Moses Charikar, Shay Solomon
arXiv ID
1711.06883
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
21
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Despite significant research efforts, the state-of-the-art algorithm for maintaining an approximate matching in fully dynamic graphs has a polynomial {worst-case} update time, even for very poor approximation guarantees. In a recent breakthrough, Bhattacharya, Henzinger and Nanongkai showed how to maintain a constant approximation to the minimum vertex cover, and thus also a constant-factor estimate of the maximum matching size, with polylogarithmic worst-case update time. Later (in SODA'17 Proc.) they improved the approximation factor all the way to $2+Ξ΅$. Nevertheless, the longstanding fundamental problem of {maintaining} an approximate matching with sub-polynomial worst-case time bounds remained open. We present a randomized algorithm for maintaining an {almost-maximal} matching in fully dynamic graphs with polylogarithmic worst-case update time. Such a matching provides $(2+Ξ΅)$-approximations for both the maximum matching and the minimum vertex cover, for any $Ξ΅> 0$. Our result was done independently of the $(2+Ξ΅)$-approximation result of Bhattacharya et al., so it provides the first $(2+Ξ΅)$-approximation for minimum vertex cover (together with Bhattacharya et al.'s result) and the first $(2+Ξ΅)$-approximation for maximum (integral) matching. The polylogarithmic worst-case update time of our algorithm holds deterministically, while the almost-maximality guarantee holds with high probability. This result not only settles the aforementioned problem on dynamic matchings, but also provides essentially the best possible approximation guarantee for dynamic vertex cover (assuming the unique games conjecture).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted