Unsupervised Classification of PolSAR Data Using a Scattering Similarity Measure Derived from a Geodesic Distance
December 01, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Debanshu Ratha, Avik Bhattacharya, Alejandro C. Frery
arXiv ID
1712.00427
Category
cs.CV: Computer Vision
Citations
37
Venue
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
In this letter, we propose a novel technique for obtaining scattering components from Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolSAR) data using the geodesic distance on the unit sphere. This geodesic distance is obtained between an elementary target and the observed Kennaugh matrix, and it is further utilized to compute a similarity measure between scattering mechanisms. The normalized similarity measure for each elementary target is then modulated with the total scattering power (Span). This measure is used to categorize pixels into three categories i.e. odd-bounce, double-bounce and volume, depending on which of the above scattering mechanisms dominate. Then the maximum likelihood classifier of [J.-S. Lee, M. R. Grunes, E. Pottier, and L. Ferro-Famil, Unsupervised terrain classification preserving polarimetric scattering characteristics, IEEE Trans. Geos. Rem. Sens., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 722731, April 2004.] based on the complex Wishart distribution is iteratively used for each category. Dominant scattering mechanisms are thus preserved in this classification scheme. We show results for L-band AIRSAR and ALOS-2 datasets acquired over San Francisco and Mumbai, respectively. The scattering mechanisms are better preserved using the proposed methodology than the unsupervised classification results using the Freeman-Durden scattering powers on an orientation angle (OA) corrected PolSAR image. Furthermore, (1) the scattering similarity is a completely non-negative quantity unlike the negative powers that might occur in double- bounce and odd-bounce scattering component under Freeman Durden decomposition (FDD), and (2) the methodology can be extended to more canonical targets as well as for bistatic scattering.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computer Vision
π
π
Old Age
π
π
Old Age
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
π
π
Old Age
SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
π
π
Old Age
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
π
π
Old Age
Fast R-CNN
π
π
Old Age
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted