Size Matters: A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms

December 03, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Paul Wagenseller, Feng Wang arXiv ID 1712.01690 Category cs.SI: Social & Info Networks Cross-listed physics.soc-ph Citations 47 Venue IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Understanding community structure of social media is critical due to its broad applications such as friend recommendations, user modeling and content personalizations. Existing research uses structural metrics such as modularity and conductance and functional metrics such as ground truth to measure the qualify of the communities discovered by various community detection algorithms, while overlooking a natural and important dimension, community size. Recently, anthropologist Dunbar suggests that the size of stable community in social media should be limited to 150, referred to as Dunbar's number. In this study, we propose a systematic way of algorithm comparison by orthogonally integrating community size as a new dimension into existing structural metrics for consistently and holistically evaluating the community quality in social media context. we design a heuristic clique based algorithm which controls the size and overlap of communities with adjustable parameters and evaluate it along with five state-of-the-art community detection algorithms on both Twitter network and DBLP network. Specifically, we divide the discovered communities based on their size into four classes called close friend, casual friend, acquaintance, and just a face, and then calculate the coverage, modularity, triangle participation ratio, conductance, transitivity, and the internal density of communities in each class. We discover that communities in different classes exhibit diverse structural qualities and many existing community detection algorithms tend to output extremely large communities.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Social & Info Networks

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted