A Collection of Lower Bounds for Online Matching on the Line

December 19, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Antonios Antoniadis, Carsten Fischer, Andreas TΓΆnnis arXiv ID 1712.07099 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 21 Venue Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In the online matching on the line problem, the task is to match a set of requests $R$ online to a given set of servers $S$. The distance metric between any two points in $R\,\cup\, S$ is a line metric and the objective for the online algorithm is to minimize the sum of distances between matched server-request pairs. This problem is well-studied and - despite recent improvements - there is still a large gap between the best known lower and upper bounds: The best known deterministic algorithm for the problem is $O(\log^2n)$-competitive, while the best known deterministic lower bound is $9.001$. The lower and upper bounds for randomized algorithms are $4.5$ and $O(\log n)$ respectively. We prove that any deterministic online algorithm which in each round: $(i)$ bases the matching decision only on information local to the current request, and $(ii)$ is symmetric (in the sense that the decision corresponding to the mirror image of some instance $I$ is the mirror image of the decision corresponding to instance $I$), must be $Ξ©(\log n)$-competitive. We then extend the result by showing that it also holds when relaxing the symmetry property so that the algorithm might prefer one side over the other, but only up to some degree. This proves a barrier of $Ξ©(\log n)$ on the competitive ratio for a large class of "natural" algorithms. This class includes all deterministic online algorithms found in the literature so far. Furthermore, we show that our result can be extended to randomized algorithms that locally induce a symmetric distribution over the chosen servers. The $Ξ©(\log n)$-barrier on the competitive ratio holds for this class of algorithms as well.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted