Parameterized (Approximate) Defective Coloring

January 11, 2018 · Declared Dead · 🏛 Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science

👻 CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Rémy Belmonte, Michael Lampis, Valia Mitsou arXiv ID 1801.03879 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 17 Venue Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In Defective Coloring we are given a graph $G = (V, E)$ and two integers $χ_d, Δ^*$ and are asked if we can partition $V$ into $χ_d$ color classes, so that each class induces a graph of maximum degree $Δ^*$. We investigate the complexity of this generalization of Coloring with respect to several well-studied graph parameters, and show that the problem is W-hard parameterized by treewidth, pathwidth, tree-depth, or feedback vertex set, if $χ_d = 2$. As expected, this hardness can be extended to larger values of $χ_d$ for most of these parameters, with one surprising exception: we show that the problem is FPT parameterized by feedback vertex set for any $χ_d \ge 2$, and hence 2-coloring is the only hard case for this parameter. In addition to the above, we give an ETH-based lower bound for treewidth and pathwidth, showing that no algorithm can solve the problem in $n^{o(pw)}$, essentially matching the complexity of an algorithm obtained with standard techniques. We complement these results by considering the problem's approximability and show that, with respect to $Δ^*$, the problem admits an algorithm which for any $ε> 0$ runs in time $(tw/ε)^{O(tw)}$ and returns a solution with exactly the desired number of colors that approximates the optimal $Δ^*$ within $(1 + ε)$. We also give a $(tw)^{O(tw)}$ algorithm which achieves the desired $Δ^*$ exactly while 2-approximating the minimum value of $χ_d$. We show that this is close to optimal, by establishing that no FPT algorithm can (under standard assumptions) achieve a better than $3/2$-approximation to $χ_d$, even when an extra constant additive error is also allowed.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted