Coded Status Updates in an Energy Harvesting Erasure Channel

February 01, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Abdulrahman Baknina, Sennur Ulukus arXiv ID 1802.00431 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Cross-listed cs.NI, eess.SP Citations 52 Venue Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We consider an energy harvesting transmitter sending status updates to a receiver over an erasure channel, where each status update is of length $k$ symbols. The energy arrivals and the channel erasures are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) and Bernoulli distributed in each slot. In order to combat the effects of the erasures in the channel and the uncertainty in the energy arrivals, we use channel coding to encode the status update symbols. We consider two types of channel coding: maximum distance separable (MDS) codes and rateless erasure codes. For each of these models, we study two achievable schemes: best-effort and save-and-transmit. In the best-effort scheme, the transmitter starts transmission right away, and sends a symbol if it has energy. In the save-and-transmit scheme, the transmitter remains silent in the beginning in order to save some energy to minimize energy outages in future slots. We analyze the average age of information (AoI) under each of these policies. We show through numerical results that as the average recharge rate decreases, MDS coding with save-and-transmit outperforms all best-effort schemes. We show that rateless coding with save-and-transmit outperforms all the other schemes.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted