Can Common Crawl reliably track persistent identifier (PID) use over time?

January 26, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› The Web Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Henry S. Thompson, Jian Tong arXiv ID 1802.01424 Category cs.DL: Digital Libraries Cross-listed cs.NI Citations 6 Venue The Web Conference Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
We report here on the results of two studies using two and four monthly web crawls respectively from the Common Crawl (CC) initiative between 2014 and 2017, whose initial goal was to provide empirical evidence for the changing patterns of use of so-called persistent identifiers. This paper focusses on the tooling needed for dealing with CC data, and the problems we found with it. The first study is based on over $10^{12}$ URIs from over $5 * 10^9$ pages crawled in April 2014 and April 2017, the second study adds a further $3 * 10^9$ pages from the April 2015 and April 2016 crawls. We conclude with suggestions on specific actions needed to enable studies based on CC to give reliable longitudinal information.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Digital Libraries

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted