A Blockchain Based Liability Attribution Framework for Autonomous Vehicles
February 14, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Chuka Oham, Salil S. Kanhere, Raja Jurdak, Sanjay Jha
arXiv ID
1802.05050
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Cross-listed
cs.CY
Citations
47
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
The advent of autonomous vehicles is envisaged to disrupt the auto insurance liability model.Compared to the the current model where liability is largely attributed to the driver,autonomous vehicles necessitate the consideration of other entities in the automotive ecosystem including the auto manufacturer,software provider,service technician and the vehicle owner.The proliferation of sensors and connecting technologies in autonomous vehicles enables an autonomous vehicle to gather sufficient data for liability attribution,yet increased connectivity exposes the vehicle to attacks from interacting entities.These possibilities motivate potential liable entities to repudiate their involvement in a collision event to evade liability. While the data collected from vehicular sensors and vehicular communications is an integral part of the evidence for arbitrating liability in the event of an accident,there is also a need to record all interactions between the aforementioned entities to identify potential instances of negligence that may have played a role in the accident.In this paper,we propose a BlockChain(BC) based framework that integrates the concerned entities in the liability model and provides untampered evidence for liability attribution and adjudication.We first describe the liability attribution model, identify key requirements and describe the adversarial capabilities of entities. Also,we present a detailed description of data contributing to evidence.Our framework uses permissioned BC and partitions the BC to tailor data access to relevant BC participants.Finally,we conduct a security analysis to verify that the identified requirements are met and resilience of our proposed framework to identified attacks.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted