Gradient descent with identity initialization efficiently learns positive definite linear transformations by deep residual networks

February 16, 2018 · Declared Dead · 🏛 Neural Computation

👻 CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Peter L. Bartlett, David P. Helmbold, Philip M. Long arXiv ID 1802.06093 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.NE, math.OC, math.ST, stat.ML Citations 121 Venue Neural Computation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We analyze algorithms for approximating a function $f(x) = Φx$ mapping $\Re^d$ to $\Re^d$ using deep linear neural networks, i.e. that learn a function $h$ parameterized by matrices $Θ_1,...,Θ_L$ and defined by $h(x) = Θ_L Θ_{L-1} ... Θ_1 x$. We focus on algorithms that learn through gradient descent on the population quadratic loss in the case that the distribution over the inputs is isotropic. We provide polynomial bounds on the number of iterations for gradient descent to approximate the least squares matrix $Φ$, in the case where the initial hypothesis $Θ_1 = ... = Θ_L = I$ has excess loss bounded by a small enough constant. On the other hand, we show that gradient descent fails to converge for $Φ$ whose distance from the identity is a larger constant, and we show that some forms of regularization toward the identity in each layer do not help. If $Φ$ is symmetric positive definite, we show that an algorithm that initializes $Θ_i = I$ learns an $ε$-approximation of $f$ using a number of updates polynomial in $L$, the condition number of $Φ$, and $\log(d/ε)$. In contrast, we show that if the least squares matrix $Φ$ is symmetric and has a negative eigenvalue, then all members of a class of algorithms that perform gradient descent with identity initialization, and optionally regularize toward the identity in each layer, fail to converge. We analyze an algorithm for the case that $Φ$ satisfies $u^{\top} Φu > 0$ for all $u$, but may not be symmetric. This algorithm uses two regularizers: one that maintains the invariant $u^{\top} Θ_L Θ_{L-1} ... Θ_1 u > 0$ for all $u$, and another that "balances" $Θ_1, ..., Θ_L$ so that they have the same singular values.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Machine Learning

Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted