Lower Bounds on Sparse Spanners, Emulators, and Diameter-reducing shortcuts

February 17, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shang-En Huang, Seth Pettie arXiv ID 1802.06271 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 36 Venue Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We prove better lower bounds on additive spanners and emulators, which are lossy compression schemes for undirected graphs, as well as lower bounds on shortcut sets, which reduce the diameter of directed graphs. We show that any $O(n)$-size shortcut set cannot bring the diameter below $Ξ©(n^{1/6})$, and that any $O(m)$-size shortcut set cannot bring it below $Ξ©(n^{1/11})$. These improve Hesse's [Hesse03] lower bound of $Ξ©(n^{1/17})$. By combining these constructions with Abboud and Bodwin's [AbboudB17] edge-splitting technique, we get additive stretch lower bounds of $+Ξ©(n^{1/11})$ for $O(n)$-size spanners and $+Ξ©(n^{1/18})$ for $O(n)$-size emulators. These improve Abboud and Bodwin's $+Ξ©(n^{1/22})$ lower bounds.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted