A Simple Parallel and Distributed Sampling Technique: Local Glauber Dynamics

February 19, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Distributed Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Manuela Fischer, Mohsen Ghaffari arXiv ID 1802.06676 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 24 Venue International Symposium on Distributed Computing Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
\emph{Sampling} constitutes an important tool in a variety of areas: from machine learning and combinatorial optimization to computational physics and biology. A central class of sampling algorithms is the \emph{Markov Chain Monte Carlo} method, based on the construction of a Markov chain with the desired sampling distribution as its stationary distribution. Many of the traditional Markov chains, such as the \emph{Glauber dynamics}, do not scale well with increasing dimension. To address this shortcoming, we propose a simple local update rule based on the Glauber dynamics that leads to efficient parallel and distributed algorithms for sampling from Gibbs distributions. Concretely, we present a Markov chain that mixes in $O(\log n)$ rounds when Dobrushin's condition for the Gibbs distribution is satisfied. This improves over the \emph{LubyGlauber} algorithm by Feng, Sun, and Yin [PODC'17], which needs $O(Ξ”\log n)$ rounds, and their \emph{LocalMetropolis} algorithm, which converges in $O(\log n)$ rounds but requires a considerably stronger mixing condition. Here, $n$ denotes the number of nodes in the graphical model inducing the Gibbs distribution, and $Ξ”$ its maximum degree. In particular, our method can sample a uniform proper coloring with $Ξ±Ξ”$ colors in $O(\log n)$ rounds for any $Ξ±>2$, which almost matches the threshold of the sequential Glauber dynamics and improves on the $Ξ±>2 +\sqrt{2}$ threshold of Feng et al.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted