On Local Distributed Sampling and Counting
February 19, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Weiming Feng, Yitong Yin
arXiv ID
1802.06686
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DC
Citations
18
Venue
ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
In classic distributed graph problems, each instance on a graph specifies a space of feasible solutions (e.g. all proper ($Ξ+1$)-list-colorings of the graph), and the task of distributed algorithm is to construct a feasible solution using local information. We study distributed sampling and counting problems, in which each instance specifies a joint distribution of feasible solutions. The task of distributed algorithm is to sample from this joint distribution, or to locally measure the volume of the probability space via the marginal probabilities. The latter task is also known as inference, which is a local counterpart of counting. For self-reducible classes of instances, the following equivalences are established in the LOCAL model up to polylogarithmic factors: $\bullet$ For all joint distributions, approximate inference and approximate sampling are computationally equivalent. $\bullet$ For all joint distributions defined by local constraints, exact sampling is reducible to either one of the above tasks. $\bullet$ If further, sequentially constructing a feasible solution is trivial locally, then all above tasks are easy if and only if the joint distribution exhibits strong spatial mixing. Combining with the state of the arts of strong spatial mixing, we obtain efficient sampling algorithms in the LOCAL model for various important sampling problems, including: an $O(\sqrtΞ\log^3n)$-round algorithm for exact sampling matchings in graphs with maximum degree $Ξ$, and an $O(\log^3n)$-round algorithm for sampling according to the hardcore model (weighted independent sets) in the uniqueness regime, which along with the $Ξ©(\mathrm{diam})$ lower bound in arXiv:1702.00142 for sampling according to the hardcore model in the non-uniqueness regime, gives the first computational phase transition for distributed sampling.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted