Near-Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Multivariate Log-concave Densities

February 28, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Timothy Carpenter, Ilias Diakonikolas, Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Alistair Stewart arXiv ID 1802.10575 Category math.ST Cross-listed cs.IT, cs.LG Citations 25 Venue Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of learning multivariate log-concave densities with respect to a global loss function. We obtain the first upper bound on the sample complexity of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for a log-concave density on $\mathbb{R}^d$, for all $d \geq 4$. Prior to this work, no finite sample upper bound was known for this estimator in more than $3$ dimensions. In more detail, we prove that for any $d \geq 1$ and $Ξ΅>0$, given $\tilde{O}_d((1/Ξ΅)^{(d+3)/2})$ samples drawn from an unknown log-concave density $f_0$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$, the MLE outputs a hypothesis $h$ that with high probability is $Ξ΅$-close to $f_0$, in squared Hellinger loss. A sample complexity lower bound of $Ξ©_d((1/Ξ΅)^{(d+1)/2})$ was previously known for any learning algorithm that achieves this guarantee. We thus establish that the sample complexity of the log-concave MLE is near-optimal, up to an $\tilde{O}(1/Ξ΅)$ factor.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” math.ST

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted