String Attractors: Verification and Optimization

March 05, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Embedded Systems and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Dominik Kempa, Alberto Policriti, Nicola Prezza, Eva Rotenberg arXiv ID 1803.01695 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 12 Venue Embedded Systems and Applications Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
String attractors [STOC 2018] are combinatorial objects recently introduced to unify all known dictionary compression techniques in a single theory. A set $Ξ“\subseteq [1..n]$ is a $k$-attractor for a string $S\in[1..Οƒ]^n$ if and only if every distinct substring of $S$ of length at most $k$ has an occurrence straddling at least one of the positions in $Ξ“$. Finding the smallest $k$-attractor is NP-hard for $k\geq3$, but polylogarithmic approximations can be found using reductions from dictionary compressors. It is easy to reduce the $k$-attractor problem to a set-cover instance where string's positions are interpreted as sets of substrings. The main result of this paper is a much more powerful reduction based on the truncated suffix tree. Our new characterization of the problem leads to more efficient algorithms for string attractors: we show how to check the validity and minimality of a $k$-attractor in near-optimal time and how to quickly compute exact and approximate solutions. For example, we prove that a minimum $3$-attractor can be found in optimal $O(n)$ time when $Οƒ\in O(\sqrt[3+Ξ΅]{\log n})$ for any constant $Ξ΅>0$, and $2.45$-approximation can be computed in $O(n)$ time on general alphabets. To conclude, we introduce and study the complexity of the closely-related sharp-$k$-attractor problem: to find the smallest set of positions capturing all distinct substrings of length exactly $k$. We show that the problem is in P for $k=1,2$ and is NP-complete for constant $k\geq 3$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted