Re-thinking EEG-based non-invasive brain interfaces: modeling and analysis
March 27, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Gaurav Gupta, Sergio Pequito, Paul Bogdan
arXiv ID
1803.10318
Category
q-bio.NC
Cross-listed
cs.HC,
eess.SY
Citations
38
Venue
International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
Brain interfaces are cyber-physical systems that aim to harvest information from the (physical) brain through sensing mechanisms, extract information about the underlying processes, and decide/actuate accordingly. Nonetheless, the brain interfaces are still in their infancy, but reaching to their maturity quickly as several initiatives are released to push forward their development (e.g., NeuraLink by Elon Musk and `typing-by-brain' by Facebook). This has motivated us to revisit the design of EEG-based non-invasive brain interfaces. Specifically, current methodologies entail a highly skilled neuro-functional approach and evidence-based \emph{a priori} knowledge about specific signal features and their interpretation from a neuro-physiological point of view. Hereafter, we propose to demystify such approaches, as we propose to leverage new time-varying complex network models that equip us with a fractal dynamical characterization of the underlying processes. Subsequently, the parameters of the proposed complex network models can be explained from a system's perspective, and, consecutively, used for classification using machine learning algorithms and/or actuation laws determined using control system's theory. Besides, the proposed system identification methods and techniques have computational complexities comparable with those currently used in EEG-based brain interfaces, which enable comparable online performances. Furthermore, we foresee that the proposed models and approaches are also valid using other invasive and non-invasive technologies. Finally, we illustrate and experimentally evaluate this approach on real EEG-datasets to assess and validate the proposed methodology. The classification accuracies are high even on having less number of training samples.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β q-bio.NC
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SuperSpike: Supervised learning in multi-layer spiking neural networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Generic decoding of seen and imagined objects using hierarchical visual features
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Convolutional Neural Networks as a Model of the Visual System: Past, Present, and Future
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A probabilistic atlas of the human thalamic nuclei combining ex vivo MRI and histology
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Why Neurons Have Thousands of Synapses, A Theory of Sequence Memory in Neocortex
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted