Relating modularity maximization and stochastic block models in multilayer networks

April 05, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors A. Roxana Pamfil, Sam D. Howison, Renaud Lambiotte, Mason A. Porter arXiv ID 1804.01964 Category cs.SI: Social & Info Networks Cross-listed math.PR, physics.data-an, physics.soc-ph Citations 37 Venue SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Characterizing large-scale organization in networks, including multilayer networks, is one of the most prominent topics in network science and is important for many applications. One type of mesoscale feature is community structure, in which sets of nodes are densely connected internally but sparsely connected to other dense sets of nodes. Two of the most popular approaches for community detection are to maximize an objective function called "modularity" and to perform statistical inference using stochastic block models. Generalizing work by Newman on monolayer networks (Physical Review E 94, 052315), we show in multilayer networks that maximizing modularity is equivalent, under certain conditions, to maximizing the posterior probability of community assignments under a suitably chosen stochastic block model. We derive versions of this equivalence for various types of multilayer structure, including temporal, multiplex, and multilevel networks. We consider cases in which the key parameters are constant, as well as ones in which they vary across layers; in the latter case, this yields a novel, layer-weighted version of the modularity function. Our results also help address a longstanding difficulty of multilayer modularity-maximization algorithms, which require the specification of two sets of tuning parameters that have been difficult to choose in practice. We show how to perform this parameter selection in a statistically-grounded way, and we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on both synthetic and empirical networks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Social & Info Networks

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted