New Lower Bounds for Permutation Arrays Using Contraction

April 11, 2018 · The Ethereal · 🏛 Designs, Codes and Cryptography

🔮 THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory — exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sergey Bereg, Zevi Miller, Luis Gerardo Mojica, Linda Morales, I. H. Sudborough arXiv ID 1804.03768 Category math.CO: Combinatorics Cross-listed cs.IT Citations 9 Venue Designs, Codes and Cryptography Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
A permutation array $A$ is a set of permutations on a finite set $Ω$, say of size $n$. Given distinct permutations $π, σ\in Ω$, we let $hd(π, σ) = |\{ x\in Ω: π(x) \ne σ(x) \}|$, called the Hamming distance between $π$ and $σ$. Now let $hd(A) =$ min$\{ hd(π, σ): π, σ\in A \}$. For positive integers $n$ and $d$ with $d\le n$, we let $M(n,d)$ be the maximum number of permutations in any array $A$ satisfying $hd(A) \geq d$. There is an extensive literature on the function $M(n,d)$, motivated in part by suggested applications to error correcting codes for message transmission over power lines. A basic fact is that if a permutation group $G$ is sharply $k$-transitive on a set of size $n\geq k$, then $M(n,n-k+1) = |G|$. Motivated by this we consider the permutation groups $AGL(1,q)$ and $PGL(2,q)$ acting sharply $2$-transitively on $GF(q)$ and sharply $3$-transitively on $GF(q)\cup \{\infty\}$ respectively. Applying a contraction operation to these groups, we obtain the following new lower bounds for prime powers $q$ satisfying $q\equiv 1$ (mod $3$). 1. $M(q-1,q-3)\geq (q^{2} - 1)/2$ for $q$ odd, $q\geq 7$, 2. $M(q-1,q-3)\geq (q-1)(q+2)/3$ for $q$ even, $q\geq 8$, 3. $M(q,q-3)\geq Kq^{2}\log q$ for some constant $K$ if $q$ is odd, $q\geq 13$. These results resolve a case left open in a previous paper \cite{BLS}, where it was shown that $M(q-1, q-3) \geq q^{2} - q$ and $M(q,q-3) \geq q^{3} - q$ for all prime powers $q$ such that $q\not \equiv 1$ (mod $3$). We also obtain lower bounds for $M(n,d)$ for a finite number of exceptional pairs $n,d$, by applying this contraction operation to the sharply $4$ and $5$-transitive Mathieu groups.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Combinatorics

🔮 🔮 The Ethereal

Tables of subspace codes

Daniel Heinlein, Michael Kiermaier, ... (+2 more)

math.CO 🏛 arXiv 📚 94 cites 10 years ago