Non-Malleable Extractors and Non-Malleable Codes: Partially Optimal Constructions

April 09, 2018 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xin Li arXiv ID 1804.04005 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.CR, math.CO Citations 54 Venue IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
The recent line of study on randomness extractors has been a great success, resulting in exciting new techniques, new connections, and breakthroughs to long standing open problems in several seemingly different topics. These include seeded non-malleable extractors, privacy amplification protocols with an active adversary, independent source extractors (and explicit Ramsey graphs), and non-malleable codes in the split state model. However, in all cases there is still a gap to optimum and the motivation to close this gap remains strong. In this paper, we introduce a set of new techniques to further push the frontier in the above questions. Our techniques lead to improvements in all of the above questions, and in several cases partially optimal constructions. Specifically, we obtain: 1. A seeded non-malleable extractor with seed length $O(log n)+log^{1+o(1)}(1/ฮต) and entropy requirement O(log log n+log(1/ฮต)), where the entropy requirement is asymptotically optimal by a recent result of Gur and Shinkar \cite{GurS17}; 2. A two-round privacy amplification protocol with optimal entropy loss for security parameter up to ฮฉ(k), which solves the privacy amplification problem completely; 3. A two-source extractor for entropy O(\frac{log n log log n}{log log log n}), which also gives an explicit Ramsey graph on N vertices with no clique or independent set of size (log N)^{O(\frac{log log log N}{log log log log N})}; and 4. The first explicit non-malleable code in the 2-split state model with \emph{constant} rate, which has been a major goal in the study of non-malleable codes for quite some time. One small caveat is that the error of this code is only (an arbitrarily small) constant, but we can also achieve negligible error with rate ฮฉ(log log log n/log log n), which already improves the rate in \cite{Li17} exponentially.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity