๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Non-Malleable Extractors and Non-Malleable Codes: Partially Optimal Constructions
April 09, 2018 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Xin Li
arXiv ID
1804.04005
Category
cs.CC: Computational Complexity
Cross-listed
cs.CR,
math.CO
Citations
54
Venue
IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
The recent line of study on randomness extractors has been a great success, resulting in exciting new techniques, new connections, and breakthroughs to long standing open problems in several seemingly different topics. These include seeded non-malleable extractors, privacy amplification protocols with an active adversary, independent source extractors (and explicit Ramsey graphs), and non-malleable codes in the split state model. However, in all cases there is still a gap to optimum and the motivation to close this gap remains strong. In this paper, we introduce a set of new techniques to further push the frontier in the above questions. Our techniques lead to improvements in all of the above questions, and in several cases partially optimal constructions. Specifically, we obtain: 1. A seeded non-malleable extractor with seed length $O(log n)+log^{1+o(1)}(1/ฮต) and entropy requirement O(log log n+log(1/ฮต)), where the entropy requirement is asymptotically optimal by a recent result of Gur and Shinkar \cite{GurS17}; 2. A two-round privacy amplification protocol with optimal entropy loss for security parameter up to ฮฉ(k), which solves the privacy amplification problem completely; 3. A two-source extractor for entropy O(\frac{log n log log n}{log log log n}), which also gives an explicit Ramsey graph on N vertices with no clique or independent set of size (log N)^{O(\frac{log log log N}{log log log log N})}; and 4. The first explicit non-malleable code in the 2-split state model with \emph{constant} rate, which has been a major goal in the study of non-malleable codes for quite some time. One small caveat is that the error of this code is only (an arbitrarily small) constant, but we can also achieve negligible error with rate ฮฉ(log log log n/log log n), which already improves the rate in \cite{Li17} exponentially.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Computational Complexity
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
An Exponential Separation Between Randomized and Deterministic Complexity in the LOCAL Model
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformers
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
The Hardness of Approximation of Euclidean k-means
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Slightly Superexponential Parameterized Problems
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal