Detecting Deceptive Reviews using Generative Adversarial Networks

May 25, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hojjat Aghakhani, Aravind Machiry, Shirin Nilizadeh, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna arXiv ID 1805.10364 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.IR, cs.LG Citations 94 Venue 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the past few years, consumer review sites have become the main target of deceptive opinion spam, where fictitious opinions or reviews are deliberately written to sound authentic. Most of the existing work to detect the deceptive reviews focus on building supervised classifiers based on syntactic and lexical patterns of an opinion. With the successful use of Neural Networks on various classification applications, in this paper, we propose FakeGAN a system that for the first time augments and adopts Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) for a text classification task, in particular, detecting deceptive reviews. Unlike standard GAN models which have a single Generator and Discriminator model, FakeGAN uses two discriminator models and one generative model. The generator is modeled as a stochastic policy agent in reinforcement learning (RL), and the discriminators use Monte Carlo search algorithm to estimate and pass the intermediate action-value as the RL reward to the generator. Providing the generator model with two discriminator models avoids the mod collapse issue by learning from both distributions of truthful and deceptive reviews. Indeed, our experiments show that using two discriminators provides FakeGAN high stability, which is a known issue for GAN architectures. While FakeGAN is built upon a semi-supervised classifier, known for less accuracy, our evaluation results on a dataset of TripAdvisor hotel reviews show the same performance in terms of accuracy as of the state-of-the-art approaches that apply supervised machine learning. These results indicate that GANs can be effective for text classification tasks. Specifically, FakeGAN is effective at detecting deceptive reviews.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted