Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimension

June 04, 2018 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Noga Alon, Roi Livni, Maryanthe Malliaris, Shay Moran arXiv ID 1806.00949 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CR, math.LO, stat.ML Citations 123 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We show that every approximately differentially private learning algorithm (possibly improper) for a class $H$ with Littlestone dimension~$d$ requires $ฮฉ\bigl(\log^*(d)\bigr)$ examples. As a corollary it follows that the class of thresholds over $\mathbb{N}$ can not be learned in a private manner; this resolves open question due to [Bun et al., 2015, Feldman and Xiao, 2015]. We leave as an open question whether every class with a finite Littlestone dimension can be learned by an approximately differentially private algorithm.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted