Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimension
June 04, 2018 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Symposium on the Theory of Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Noga Alon, Roi Livni, Maryanthe Malliaris, Shay Moran
arXiv ID
1806.00949
Category
cs.LG: Machine Learning
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.CR,
math.LO,
stat.ML
Citations
123
Venue
Symposium on the Theory of Computing
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We show that every approximately differentially private learning algorithm (possibly improper) for a class $H$ with Littlestone dimension~$d$ requires $ฮฉ\bigl(\log^*(d)\bigr)$ examples. As a corollary it follows that the class of thresholds over $\mathbb{N}$ can not be learned in a private manner; this resolves open question due to [Bun et al., 2015, Feldman and Xiao, 2015]. We leave as an open question whether every class with a finite Littlestone dimension can be learned by an approximately differentially private algorithm.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted