Set-based Obfuscation for Strong PUFs against Machine Learning Attacks

June 06, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems Part 1: Regular Papers

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jiliang Zhang, Chaoqun Shen arXiv ID 1806.02011 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.AR Citations 94 Venue IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems Part 1: Regular Papers Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Strong physical unclonable function (PUF) is a promising solution for device authentication in resourceconstrained applications but vulnerable to machine learning attacks. In order to resist such attack, many defenses have been proposed in recent years. However, these defenses incur high hardware overhead, degenerate reliability and are inefficient against advanced machine learning attacks such as approximation attacks. In order to address these issues, we propose a Random Set-based Obfuscation (RSO) for Strong PUFs to resist machine learning attacks. The basic idea is that several stable responses are derived from the PUF itself and pre-stored as the set for obfuscation in the testing phase, and then a true random number generator is used to select any two keys to obfuscate challenges and responses with XOR operations. When the number of challenge-response pairs (CRPs) collected by the attacker exceeds the given threshold, the set will be updated immediately. In this way, machine learning attacks can be prevented with extremely low hardware overhead. Experimental results show that for a 64x64 Arbiter PUF, when the size of set is 32 and even if 1 million CRPs are collected by attackers, the prediction accuracies of Logistic regression, support vector machines, artificial neural network, convolutional neural network and covariance matrix adaptive evolutionary strategy are about 50% which is equivalent to the random guessing.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted