Bounding Bloat in Genetic Programming

June 06, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Benjamin Doerr, Timo KΓΆtzing, J. A. Gregor Lagodzinski, Johannes Lengler arXiv ID 1806.02112 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 22 Venue Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
While many optimization problems work with a fixed number of decision variables and thus a fixed-length representation of possible solutions, genetic programming (GP) works on variable-length representations. A naturally occurring problem is that of bloat (unnecessary growth of solutions) slowing down optimization. Theoretical analyses could so far not bound bloat and required explicit assumptions on the magnitude of bloat. In this paper we analyze bloat in mutation-based genetic programming for the two test functions ORDER and MAJORITY. We overcome previous assumptions on the magnitude of bloat and give matching or close-to-matching upper and lower bounds for the expected optimization time. In particular, we show that the (1+1) GP takes (i) $Θ(T_{init} + n \log n)$ iterations with bloat control on ORDER as well as MAJORITY; and (ii) $O(T_{init} \log T_{init} + n (\log n)^3)$ and $Ω(T_{init} + n \log n)$ (and $Ω(T_{init} \log T_{init})$ for $n=1$) iterations without bloat control on MAJORITY.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Neural & Evolutionary

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE πŸ› IEEE TNNLS πŸ“š 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted