Distributed Optimization over Directed Graphs with Row Stochasticity and Constraint Regularity

June 19, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› at - Automatisierungstechnik

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Van Sy Mai, Eyad H. Abed arXiv ID 1806.07081 Category math.OC: Optimization & Control Cross-listed cs.DC Citations 103 Venue at - Automatisierungstechnik Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This paper deals with an optimization problem over a network of agents, where the cost function is the sum of the individual objectives of the agents and the constraint set is the intersection of local constraints. Most existing methods employing subgradient and consensus steps for solving this problem require the weight matrix associated with the network to be column stochastic or even doubly stochastic, conditions that can be hard to arrange in directed networks. Moreover, known convergence analyses for distributed subgradient methods vary depending on whether the problem is unconstrained or constrained, and whether the local constraint sets are identical or nonidentical and compact. The main goals of this paper are: (i) removing the common column stochasticity requirement; (ii) relaxing the compactness assumption, and (iii) providing a unified convergence analysis. Specifically, assuming the communication graph to be fixed and strongly connected and the weight matrix to (only) be row stochastic, a distributed projected subgradient algorithm and its variation are presented to solve the problem for cost functions that are convex and Lipschitz continuous. Based on a regularity assumption on the local constraint sets, a unified convergence analysis is given that can be applied to both unconstrained and constrained problems and without assuming compactness of the constraint sets or an interior point in their intersection. Further, we also establish an upper bound on the absolute objective error evaluated at each agent's available local estimate under a nonincreasing step size sequence. This bound allows us to analyze the convergence rate of both algorithms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Optimization & Control

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted