How long can optimal locally repairable codes be?

July 03, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Venkatesan Guruswami, Chaoping Xing, Chen Yuan arXiv ID 1807.01064 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Cross-listed cs.CC, math.CO Citations 109 Venue IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A locally repairable code (LRC) with locality $r$ allows for the recovery of any erased codeword symbol using only $r$ other codeword symbols. A Singleton-type bound dictates the best possible trade-off between the dimension and distance of LRCs --- an LRC attaining this trade-off is deemed \emph{optimal}. Such optimal LRCs have been constructed over alphabets growing linearly in the block length. Unlike the classical Singleton bound, however, it was not known if such a linear growth in the alphabet size is necessary, or for that matter even if the alphabet needs to grow at all with the block length. Indeed, for small code distances $3,4$, arbitrarily long optimal LRCs were known over fixed alphabets. Here, we prove that for distances $d \ge 5$, the code length $n$ of an optimal LRC over an alphabet of size $q$ must be at most roughly $O(d q^3)$. For the case $d=5$, our upper bound is $O(q^2)$. We complement these bounds by showing the existence of optimal LRCs of length $Ω_{d,r}(q^{1+1/\lfloor(d-3)/2\rfloor})$ when $d \le r+2$. These bounds match when $d=5$, thus pinning down $n=Θ(q^2)$ as the asymptotically largest length of an optimal LRC for this case.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted