Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Glucose Prediction

July 09, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Kezhi Li, John Daniels, Chengyuan Liu, Pau Herrero, Pantelis Georgiou arXiv ID 1807.03043 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Citations 251 Venue IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Control of blood glucose is essential for diabetes management. Current digital therapeutic approaches for subjects with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) such as the artificial pancreas and insulin bolus calculators leverage machine learning techniques for predicting subcutaneous glucose for improved control. Deep learning has recently been applied in healthcare and medical research to achieve state-of-the-art results in a range of tasks including disease diagnosis, and patient state prediction among others. In this work, we present a deep learning model that is capable of forecasting glucose levels with leading accuracy for simulated patient cases (RMSE = 9.38$\pm$0.71 [mg/dL] over a 30-minute horizon, RMSE = 18.87$\pm$2.25 [mg/dL] over a 60-minute horizon) and real patient cases (RMSE = 21.07$\pm$2.35 [mg/dL] for 30-minute, RMSE = 33.27$\pm$4.79\% for 60-minute). In addition, the model provides competitive performance in providing effective prediction horizon ($PH_{eff}$) with minimal time lag both in a simulated patient dataset ($PH_{eff}$ = 29.0$\pm$0.7 for 30-min and $PH_{eff}$ = 49.8$\pm$2.9 for 60-min) and in a real patient dataset ($PH_{eff}$ = 19.3$\pm$3.1 for 30-min and $PH_{eff}$ = 29.3$\pm$9.4 for 60-min). This approach is evaluated on a dataset of 10 simulated cases generated from the UVa/Padova simulator and a clinical dataset of 10 real cases each containing glucose readings, insulin bolus, and meal (carbohydrate) data. Performance of the recurrent convolutional neural network is benchmarked against four algorithms. The proposed algorithm is implemented on an Android mobile phone, with an execution time of $6$ms on a phone compared to an execution time of $780$ms on a laptop.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computer Vision

πŸŒ… πŸŒ… Old Age

Fast R-CNN

Ross Girshick

cs.CV πŸ› ICCV πŸ“š 27.7K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted