Affective EEG-Based Person Identification Using the Deep Learning Approach
July 05, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Theerawit Wilaiprasitporn, Apiwat Ditthapron, Karis Matchaparn, Tanaboon Tongbuasirilai, Nannapas Banluesombatkul, Ekapol Chuangsuwanich
arXiv ID
1807.03147
Category
eess.SP: Signal Processing
Cross-listed
cs.CV
Citations
151
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is another mode for performing Person Identification (PI). Due to the nature of the EEG signals, EEG-based PI is typically done while the person is performing some kind of mental task, such as motor control. However, few works have considered EEG-based PI while the person is in different mental states (affective EEG). The aim of this paper is to improve the performance of affective EEG-based PI using a deep learning approach. \textcolor{red}{We proposed a cascade of deep learning using a combination of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)}. CNNs are used to handle the spatial information from the EEG while RNNs extract the temporal information. \textcolor{red}{We evaluated two types of RNNs, namely, Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (CNN-GRU). } The proposed method is evaluated on the state-of-the-art affective dataset DEAP. The results indicate that CNN-GRU and CNN-LSTM can perform PI from different affective states and reach up to 99.90--100\% mean Correct Recognition Rate (CRR), significantly outperforming a support vector machine (SVM) baseline system that uses power spectral density (PSD) features. Notably, the 100\% mean \emph{CRR} comes from only 40 subjects in DEAP dataset. To reduce the number of EEG electrodes from thirty-two to five for more practical applications, the frontal region gives the best results reaching up to 99.17\% CRR (from CNN-GRU). Amongst the two deep learning models, we find CNN-GRU to slightly outperform CNN-LSTM, while having faster training time. \textcolor{red}{Furthermore, CNN-GRU overcomes the influence of affective states in EEG-Based PI reported in the previous works.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Signal Processing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
1D Convolutional Neural Networks and Applications: A Survey
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Wireless Communications with Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface: Path Loss Modeling and Experimental Measurement
π
π
The Cartographer
Accessing From The Sky: A Tutorial on UAV Communications for 5G and Beyond
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
6G Wireless Systems: Vision, Requirements, Challenges, Insights, and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A New Wireless Communication Paradigm through Software-controlled Metasurfaces
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted