Affective EEG-Based Person Identification Using the Deep Learning Approach

July 05, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Theerawit Wilaiprasitporn, Apiwat Ditthapron, Karis Matchaparn, Tanaboon Tongbuasirilai, Nannapas Banluesombatkul, Ekapol Chuangsuwanich arXiv ID 1807.03147 Category eess.SP: Signal Processing Cross-listed cs.CV Citations 151 Venue IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is another mode for performing Person Identification (PI). Due to the nature of the EEG signals, EEG-based PI is typically done while the person is performing some kind of mental task, such as motor control. However, few works have considered EEG-based PI while the person is in different mental states (affective EEG). The aim of this paper is to improve the performance of affective EEG-based PI using a deep learning approach. \textcolor{red}{We proposed a cascade of deep learning using a combination of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)}. CNNs are used to handle the spatial information from the EEG while RNNs extract the temporal information. \textcolor{red}{We evaluated two types of RNNs, namely, Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (CNN-GRU). } The proposed method is evaluated on the state-of-the-art affective dataset DEAP. The results indicate that CNN-GRU and CNN-LSTM can perform PI from different affective states and reach up to 99.90--100\% mean Correct Recognition Rate (CRR), significantly outperforming a support vector machine (SVM) baseline system that uses power spectral density (PSD) features. Notably, the 100\% mean \emph{CRR} comes from only 40 subjects in DEAP dataset. To reduce the number of EEG electrodes from thirty-two to five for more practical applications, the frontal region gives the best results reaching up to 99.17\% CRR (from CNN-GRU). Amongst the two deep learning models, we find CNN-GRU to slightly outperform CNN-LSTM, while having faster training time. \textcolor{red}{Furthermore, CNN-GRU overcomes the influence of affective states in EEG-Based PI reported in the previous works.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Signal Processing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted