Algorithms that Remember: Model Inversion Attacks and Data Protection Law

July 12, 2018 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Michael Veale, Reuben Binns, Lilian Edwards arXiv ID 1807.04644 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.CR, cs.CY Citations 224 Venue Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Many individuals are concerned about the governance of machine learning systems and the prevention of algorithmic harms. The EU's recent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been seen as a core tool for achieving better governance of this area. While the GDPR does apply to the use of models in some limited situations, most of its provisions relate to the governance of personal data, while models have traditionally been seen as intellectual property. We present recent work from the information security literature around `model inversion' and `membership inference' attacks, which indicate that the process of turning training data into machine learned systems is not one-way, and demonstrate how this could lead some models to be legally classified as personal data. Taking this as a probing experiment, we explore the different rights and obligations this would trigger and their utility, and posit future directions for algorithmic governance and regulation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted