Physical-layer Security for Indoor Visible Light Communications: Secrecy Capacity Analysis

July 26, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Communications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jin-Yuan Wang, Cheng Liu, Jun-Bo Wang, Yongpeng Wu, Min Lin, Julian Cheng arXiv ID 1807.09918 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 105 Venue IEEE Transactions on Communications Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
This paper investigates the physical-layer security for an indoor visible light communication (VLC) network consisting of a transmitter, a legitimate receiver and an eavesdropper. Both the main channel and the wiretapping channel have nonnegative inputs, which are corrupted by additive white Gaussian noises. Considering the illumination requirement and the physical characteristics of lighting source, the input is also constrained in both its average and peak optical intensities. Two scenarios are investigated: one is only with an average optical intensity constraint, and the other is with both average and peak optical intensity constraints. Based on information theory, closed-form expressions of the upper and lower bounds on secrecy capacity for the two scenarios are derived. Numerical results show that the upper and lower bounds on secrecy capacity are tight, which validates the derived closed-form expressions. Moreover, the asymptotic behaviors in the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime are analyzed from the theoretical aspects. At high SNR, when only considering the average optical intensity constraint, a small performance gap exists between the asymptotic upper and lower bounds on secrecy capacity. When considering both average and peak optical intensity constraints, the asymptotic upper and lower bounds on secrecy capacity coincide with each other. These conclusions are also confirmed by numerical results.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted