Development and Evaluation of Recurrent Neural Network based Models for Hourly Traffic Volume and AADT Prediction

August 15, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Transportation Research Record

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors MD Zadid Khan, Sakib Mahmud Khan, Mashrur Chowdhury, Kakan Dey arXiv ID 1808.10511 Category stat.AP Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 44 Venue Transportation Research Record Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
The prediction of high-resolution hourly traffic volumes of a given roadway is essential for transportation planning. Traditionally, Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATR) are used to collect this hourly volume data. These large datasets are time series data characterized by long-term temporal dependencies and missing values. Regarding the temporal dependencies, all roadways are characterized by seasonal variations that can be weekly, monthly or yearly, depending on the cause of the variation. Regarding the missing data in a time-series sequence, traditional time series forecasting models perform poorly under the influence of seasonal variations. To address this limitation, robust, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) based, multi-step ahead forecasting models are developed for time-series in this study. The simple RNN, the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) units are used to develop the model and evaluate its performance. Two approaches are used to address the missing value issue: masking and imputation, in conjunction with the RNN models. Six different imputation algorithms are then used to identify the best model. The analysis indicates that the LSTM model performs better than simple RNN and GRU models, and imputation performs better than masking to predict future traffic volume. Based on analysis using 92 ATRs, the LSTM-Median model is deemed the best model in all scenarios for hourly traffic volume and AADT prediction, with an average RMSE of 274 and MAPE of 18.91% for hourly traffic volume prediction and average RMSE of 824 and MAPE of 2.10% for AADT prediction.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” stat.AP

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Forecasting: theory and practice

Fotios Petropoulos, Daniele Apiletti, ... (+78 more)

stat.AP πŸ› International Journal of Forecasting πŸ“š 481 cites 5 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted