On Solving Linear Systems in Sublinear Time
September 09, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Information Technology Convergence and Services
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Alexandr Andoni, Robert Krauthgamer, Yosef Pogrow
arXiv ID
1809.02995
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
29
Venue
Information Technology Convergence and Services
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We study \emph{sublinear} algorithms that solve linear systems locally. In the classical version of this problem the input is a matrix $S\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ and a vector $b\in\mathbb{R}^n$ in the range of $S$, and the goal is to output $x\in \mathbb{R}^n$ satisfying $Sx=b$. For the case when the matrix $S$ is symmetric diagonally dominant (SDD), the breakthrough algorithm of Spielman and Teng [STOC 2004] approximately solves this problem in near-linear time (in the input size which is the number of non-zeros in $S$), and subsequent papers have further simplified, improved, and generalized the algorithms for this setting. Here we focus on computing one (or a few) coordinates of $x$, which potentially allows for sublinear algorithms. Formally, given an index $u\in [n]$ together with $S$ and $b$ as above, the goal is to output an approximation $\hat{x}_u$ for $x^*_u$, where $x^*$ is a fixed solution to $Sx=b$. Our results show that there is a qualitative gap between SDD matrices and the more general class of positive semidefinite (PSD) matrices. For SDD matrices, we develop an algorithm that approximates a single coordinate $x_{u}$ in time that is polylogarithmic in $n$, provided that $S$ is sparse and has a small condition number (e.g., Laplacian of an expander graph). The approximation guarantee is additive $| \hat{x}_u-x^*_u | \le Ξ΅\| x^* \|_\infty$ for accuracy parameter $Ξ΅>0$. We further prove that the condition-number assumption is necessary and tight. In contrast to the SDD matrices, we prove that for certain PSD matrices $S$, the running time must be at least polynomial in $n$. This holds even when one wants to obtain the same additive approximation, and $S$ has bounded sparsity and condition number.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted