Comparison of Deep Learning and the Classical Machine Learning Algorithm for the Malware Detection

September 16, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mohit Sewak, Sanjay K. Sahay, Hemant Rathore arXiv ID 1809.05889 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.LG Citations 76 Venue Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Recently, Deep Learning has been showing promising results in various Artificial Intelligence applications like image recognition, natural language processing, language modeling, neural machine translation, etc. Although, in general, it is computationally more expensive as compared to classical machine learning techniques, their results are found to be more effective in some cases. Therefore, in this paper, we investigated and compared one of the Deep Learning Architecture called Deep Neural Network (DNN) with the classical Random Forest (RF) machine learning algorithm for the malware classification. We studied the performance of the classical RF and DNN with 2, 4 & 7 layers architectures with the four different feature sets, and found that irrespective of the features inputs, the classical RF accuracy outperforms the DNN.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted