From Same Photo: Cheating on Visual Kinship Challenges

September 17, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Asian Conference on Computer Vision

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mitchell Dawson, Andrew Zisserman, Christoffer NellΓ₯ker arXiv ID 1809.06200 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Citations 25 Venue Asian Conference on Computer Vision Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
With the propensity for deep learning models to learn unintended signals from data sets there is always the possibility that the network can `cheat' in order to solve a task. In the instance of data sets for visual kinship verification, one such unintended signal could be that the faces are cropped from the same photograph, since faces from the same photograph are more likely to be from the same family. In this paper we investigate the influence of this artefactual data inference in published data sets for kinship verification. To this end, we obtain a large dataset, and train a CNN classifier to determine if two faces are from the same photograph or not. Using this classifier alone as a naive classifier of kinship, we demonstrate near state of the art results on five public benchmark data sets for kinship verification - achieving over 90% accuracy on one of them. Thus, we conclude that faces derived from the same photograph are a strong inadvertent signal in all the data sets we examined, and it is likely that the fraction of kinship explained by existing kinship models is small.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computer Vision

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted