Large batch size training of neural networks with adversarial training and second-order information

October 02, 2018 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zhewei Yao, Amir Gholami, Daiyaan Arfeen, Richard Liaw, Joseph Gonzalez, Kurt Keutzer, Michael Mahoney arXiv ID 1810.01021 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI, math.OC, stat.ML Citations 46 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
The most straightforward method to accelerate Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) computation is to distribute the randomly selected batch of inputs over multiple processors. To keep the distributed processors fully utilized requires commensurately growing the batch size. However, large batch training often leads to poorer generalization. A recently proposed solution for this problem is to use adaptive batch sizes in SGD. In this case, one starts with a small number of processes and scales the processes as training progresses. Two major challenges with this approach are (i) that dynamically resizing the cluster can add non-trivial overhead, in part since it is currently not supported, and (ii) that the overall speed up is limited by the initial phase with smaller batches. In this work, we address both challenges by developing a new adaptive batch size framework, with autoscaling based on the Ray framework. This allows very efficient elastic scaling with negligible resizing overhead (0.32\% of time for ResNet18 ImageNet training). Furthermore, we propose a new adaptive batch size training scheme using second order methods and adversarial training. These enable increasing batch sizes earlier during training, which leads to better training time. We extensively evaluate our method on Cifar-10/100, SVHN, TinyImageNet, and ImageNet datasets, using multiple neural networks, including ResNets and smaller networks such as SqueezeNext. Our method exceeds the performance of existing solutions in terms of both accuracy and the number of SGD iterations (up to 1\% and $5\times$, respectively). Importantly, this is achieved without any additional hyper-parameter tuning to tailor our method in any of these experiments.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted