Analyzing biological and artificial neural networks: challenges with opportunities for synergy?

October 31, 2018 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Current Opinion in Neurobiology

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors David G. T. Barrett, Ari S. Morcos, Jakob H. Macke arXiv ID 1810.13373 Category q-bio.NC Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.LG, stat.ML Citations 122 Venue Current Opinion in Neurobiology Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) transform stimuli across multiple processing stages to produce representations that can be used to solve complex tasks, such as object recognition in images. However, a full understanding of how they achieve this remains elusive. The complexity of biological neural networks substantially exceeds the complexity of DNNs, making it even more challenging to understand the representations that they learn. Thus, both machine learning and computational neuroscience are faced with a shared challenge: how can we analyze their representations in order to understand how they solve complex tasks? We review how data-analysis concepts and techniques developed by computational neuroscientists can be useful for analyzing representations in DNNs, and in turn, how recently developed techniques for analysis of DNNs can be useful for understanding representations in biological neural networks. We explore opportunities for synergy between the two fields, such as the use of DNNs as in-silico model systems for neuroscience, and how this synergy can lead to new hypotheses about the operating principles of biological neural networks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” q-bio.NC

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted